Community Corrections Needs Independent Performance Review

State government should be measured for accountability and performance. (Murphy Commission, 1998)

(July 2009) The state Department of Community Corrections includes performance measures in its "Agency Strategic Plan, Fiscal Years 2007-2011." The performance measures can be viewed on pages 3-4, 6-7 and 9 of the following document:

http://www.dcc.arkansas.gov/pdfs/publications/StrategicPlan07-11.pdf

Community Corrections should also undergo an independent performance review. Performance measures and reviews date to the Murphy Commission, a Policy Foundation project that spent three years (1996-98) reviewing state government. The Pew Center on the States has identified the following process for independent performance reviews of community corrections:

  1. 1) Evidence-Based Practices

  2. 2) Earned Compliance Credits

  3. 3) Administrative Sanctions

  4. 4) Performance Incentive Funding

  5. 5) Performance Measurement



The Pew document is available at:
http://www.pewcenteronthestates.org/uploadedFiles/Executive%20Summary.pdf


Searching for Archived Policy Research? Visit www.reformarkansas.org.

Arkansas Policy Blog

Click here to view the Arkansas Policy Blog.

Peer-Reviewed Research

The Arkansas Policy Foundation is an educational organization that regularly submits its research to scholarly journals that use a peer review process.

Journal Publications

'Regulation of financial derivatives in the U.S. code'
Derivatives Use, Trading and Regulation
(London, U.K.) Palgrave Macmillian Ltd.
February 2006
Read Online

'Deflation & Economic Growth'
QJAE
(Piscataway, N.J.) Transaction Periodicals Consortium, Rutgers University
Summer 2006

Policy Foundation research on this topic cited by Arkansas Attorney General Mike Beebe (Opinion No. 2005-291)

'A review of state statutes regulating financial derivatives in the USA'
Pensions, an International Journal
(London, U.K.) Palgrave Macmillian Ltd.
2004
Read Online